O que é não religião?
Sobre as virtudes de uma estrutura de sistemas de significado para estudar cosmovisões religiosas e não religiosas no contexto da vida cotidiana
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23925/1677-1222.2023vol23i2a16Palavras-chave:
Não-Religião, Religião, Cosmovisão, significado, evoluçãoResumo
Do original What is Nonreligion? On the Virtues of a Meaning Systems Framework for Studying Nonreligious and Religious Worldviews in the Context of Everyday Life. Secularism and Nonreligion, v. 7, n. 9, pp.1-6, 2018. O tradutor agradece pela gentil autorização dada pela autora e pelos editores do periódico Secularism & Non-Religion
Downloads
Metrics
Referências
ALMA, HA e ANBEEK, CW. Worldviewing competence for narrative interreligious dialogue: A humanist contribution to spiritual care. In: Shipani, DS, org., Multifaith voices in spiritual care. Ontario: Pandora Press, 2013, 149-169.
BAKER, JO. Whither the paranormal in secular studies? NSRN Online, 2017. Available at, https://nsrn. net/2017/11/24/whither-the-paranormal-in-secular- studies/ Accessed December 5, 2017.
BARRETT, HC. The shape of thought: How mental adaptations evolve. New York: Oxford University Press, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199348305.001.0001
BAUMEISTER, RF. Meanings of life. New York: Guilford, 1991.
BRODD, J, et al. Invitation to world religions, 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016.
BULLIVANT, S, e LEE, L. The dictionary of atheism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1093/acref/9780191816819.001.0001
COLEMAN, TJ, III, SILVER, CF e HOLCOMBE, J. Focusing on horizontal transcendence: Much more than a “non-belief." Essays in the Philosophy of Humanism, 21(2), 2013, 1-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1558/eph. v21i2.1
DEWITT, R. Worldviews: An introduction to the history and philosophy of science, 2nd ed. Wiley-Blackwell, 2010.
DROOGERS, AF e VAN HARSKAMP, A., orgs. Methods for the study of religious change: From Religious Studies to Worldview Studies. Sheffield, UK: Equinox Pub., 2014.
HEINTZELMAN, SJ e KING, L. On knowing more than we can tell: Intuitive processes and the experience of meaning. Journal of Positive Psychology, 8(6), 2013, 471-482. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2013.830758
HUTCHINGS, T. Angels and the digital afterlife: Studying nonreligion online [online]. NSRN Online. 2016, Available from: https://nsrn.net/2016/05/18/blog- series-angels-and-the-digital-afterlife-studying-nonreligion-online/. Accessed December 5, 2017.
JACKSON, R. Signposts: Policy and practice for teaching about religions and non-religious world views in intercultural education. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing, 2014.
JACKSON, R. Inclusive study of religions and world views in schools: Signposts from the Council of Europe. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing, 2016.
JUERGENSMEYER, M. 2009 Presidential Address: Beyond war and words: The global future of religion. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 78(4), 2010, 882-895. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lfq048
KOLTKO-RIVERA, ME. The psychology of worldviews. Review of General Psychology, 8(1), 2004, 3-58. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.8.1.3
LEE, L. Talking about a revolution: Terminology for the new field of Non-religion Studies. Journal of Contemporary Religion, 27(1), 2012, 129-139. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1080/13537903.2012.642742
LEE, L. Recognising the non-religious: Reimagining the secular. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198736844.001.0001
LEONTIEV, DA. Personal meaning: A challenge for psychology. Journal of Positive Psychology, 8(6), 2013, 459 470. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2013.830767
MARKMAN, KD, PROULX, T e LINDBERG, MJ., orgs. The psychology of meaning. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/14040-000
NAUGLE, DK. Worldview: The history of a concept. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2002.
PALOUTZIAN, R, e MUKAI, K. Believing, remembering, and imagining: The roots and fruits of meanings made and remade. In: Angel, H-F, Oviedo, L, Paloutzian, RF, Runehov, ALC and Seitz, RJ, orgs. Process of Believing: The Acquisition, Maintenance, and Change in Creditions. Heidelberg: Springer, 2017, 39-49.
PARK, CL. Religion and meaning. In: Paloutzian, RF and Park, CL, orgs. The Handbook of Psychology of Religion and Spirituality. New York: Guilford, 2005.
PARK, CL. Making sense of the meaning literature: An integrative review of meaning making and its effects on adjustment to stressful life events. Psychological Bulletin, 136(2), 2010, 257-301. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1037/a0018301
Park, CL. Religion and meaning. In: Paloutzian, RF and Park, CL, orgs. The Handbook of Psychology of Religion and Spirituality 2nd ed. New York: Guilford, 2013.
PARK, CL e FOLKMAN S. Meaning in the context of stress and coping. Review of General Psychology, 1, 1997, 115-144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.1.2.115
PARK, CL e GEORGE, LS. Assessing meaning and meaning making in the context of stressful life events: Measurement tools and approaches. Journal of Positive Psychology, 8(6), 2013, 483-504. DOI: https://doi.org/10.10 80/17439760.2013.830762
PETERSON, JB. Three forms of meaning and the management of complexity. In: Markman, KD, Proulx, T e Lindberg, MJ, orgs., The psychology of meaning. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/14040-002
POOLE, FJP. Metaphors and maps: Towards comparison in the anthropology of religion. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 54(3), 1986, 411-457. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/LIV3.411
PROTHERO, S. God is not one. San Francisco: Harper One, 2010.
QUACK, J AND SCHUH, C., orgs. Religious indifferences: Between and beyond religion and nonreligion New York: Springer, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3- 319-48476-1
SCHNELL, T. Existential indifference: Another quality of meaning in life. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 50, 2010, 351-373. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022167809360259
SILVER, RC e UPDEGRAFF, J. Searching for and finding meaning following personal and collective traumas. In: Markman, KD, Proulx, T and Lindberg, MJ, orgs. The psychology of meaning. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/14040-012
SMART, N. The philosophy of worldviews: The philosophy of religion transformed. In: Concept and Empathy, Essays in the Study of Religion. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1986, 72-85.
SMART, N. Worldviews: Cross-cultural explorations of human beliefs, 3rd ed. Prentice Hall, 1999.
TAVES, A. Finding and articulating meaning in secular experience. In: Fleming, D, Leven, E and Riegel, U, orgs., Religious Experience. Munich: Waxmann Verlag, 2018.
TAVES, A. Revisiting Ninian Smart’s call for Worldview Studies [online]. Practicum: Critical Theory Religion, and Pedagogy, 2017. http://practicumreligionblog.blogspot.com/2017/10/rethinking-classic-textstheorists.html.
TAVES, A e ASPREM, E. Scientific Worldview Studies: A programmatic proposal. In: Petersen, AK, et al., orgs, A new synthesis: Cognition, evolution, and history in the study of religion. Leiden: Brill, 2018.
TAVES, A, ASPREM, E e IHM, E. Psychology, meaning making and the study of worldviews: Beyond religion and non-religion. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 10(3), 2018, 207-217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/ rel0000201
VIDAL, C. Wat is een wereldbeeld? [What is a worldview?]. In: Van Belle, H and Van der Veken, orgs., Nieuwheid denken. De wetenschappen en het creatieve aspect van de werkelijkheid Leuven: Acco, 2008.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
- Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International, que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
- Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
