The argument that external fraud should be the sole criterion for refusing to recognize and enforce foreign court judgments and its prospects
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.23925/2526-6284/2024.v4n4.71693Mots-clés :
Fraud exception; Substantive review; External fraud; Individual case justiceRésumé
The recognition and enforcement of commercial judgments and rulings in the cross-border context have always been a crucial aspect of international trade transactions. Particularly in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, which caused a global economic halt, international trade disputes have surged, making the recognition and enforcement of international commercial judgments increasingly significant. The fraud exception in the cross-border recognition and enforcement of commercial judgments has emerged as a pressing issue. It is prevalent in practice and presents complex challenges that require resolution. This article will discuss whether external fraud should be the sole criterion for refusing to recognize and enforce foreign judgments.The aim is to logically outline the institutional framework for the recognition and enforcement of judgments in the realm of cross-border transactions.
Téléchargements
Métriques
Références
Bishop R D.Burnette.S.(1982).United States Practice Concerning the Recognition of Foreign Judgments:International Lawyer (ABA).https://www.jstor.org/stable/755686.
Catherine Kessedjian. Is the Hague Convention of 2 July 2019 a useful tool forcompanies who are conducting international activities? [J]. Nederlands International Privaatrecht, 2020: 32. https://www.asser.nl/asserpress/journals/nederlands-internationaal-privaatrecht-nipr/.
Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters: Is the Hague Convention of 2 July 2019 a useful tool for companies who are conducting international activities?:Nederlands International Privaatrecht,2020. https://www.asser.nl/asserpress/journals/nederlands-internationaal-privaatrecht-nipr/.
Michael H. Brenscheidt.(1977).The Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Money Judgments in the Federal Republic of Germany,International.Lawyer,2.https://scholar.smu.edu/til/vol11/iss2/4/.
Powell v Cockburn.(1977).2C.S.R218.https://decisions.scc-csc.ca/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/4339/index.do
PM North & JJ Fawett.(1999).Cheshire and North's Private International Law,Oxford University Press, p.444.https://corp.oup.com/?lang=en
Ruth Bader Ginsburg.(1970).Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Civil Judgments:A Summary View of the Situation in the United States,(04) International Lawyer, 727- 728.https://scholar.smu.edu/til/vol4/iss4/
Sung Hoon Lee.(2006)Foreign Judgment Recognition and Enforcement System of Korea [J]. Journal of Korean Law, 6(1):123-124.https://jkl.snu.ac.kr/
United States v. Throckmorton.(1878).98 U.S. 61, 65-68, 25 L. Ed. 93.https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/98/61
Wang Jianqi.(2023).On the exception of fraud in recognition and enforcement of a foreign court decision[D].institute of diplomacy. http://DOI:10.27373/d.cnki.gwjxc.2023.000259.
