THE EUCALYPTUS FARMING'S "BLACK BOX": SCIENTIFIC DISPUTES, POLITICAL DISPUTES AND SOCIETY PROJECTS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23925/2176-2767.2019v65p380-415

Keywords:

Eucalyptus farming. Aracruz Celulose. Augusto Ruschi

Abstract

In this work, I discuss aspects of the scientific controversy about the eucalyptus tree in Brazil and try to understand the political disputes and the social-environmental projects brought up by the different contenders. Inspired by the reflections of Bruno Latour about the scientific make, I intend to rebuilt the path covered by the naturalist Augusto Ruschi in creating reforestation notions and methods which gained a different political instrumentation in the state of Espírito Santo during the decades of 1940-1950 and 1960-1970: at first, his arguments were near the “rational forestry”; then he adopted a strong discourse against the eucalyptus farming. I argue that, more than the rejection of the eucalyptus itself, Ruschi positioned himself against a specific social economical project: the one from the Group Aracruz Celulose S.A.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Alyne dos Santos Gonçalves, Instituto Nacional da Mata Atlântica

Possui graduação, mestrado e doutorado em História pela Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES), atuando principalmente nas áreas de História Ambiental, História da Ciência, História Regional e organização de acervos pessoais. É membro do Laboratório de História Regional do Espírito Santo e Conexões Atlânticas (LACES), do PPGHIS-UFES. É bolsista de pós doutorado do Fundo de Amparo à Pesquisa do Espírito Santo (FAPES), no Instituto Nacional da Mata Atlântica (INMA), do Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia, Inovações e Comunicações (MCTIC).

Published

2019-08-02

How to Cite

Gonçalves, A. dos S. (2019). THE EUCALYPTUS FARMING’S "BLACK BOX": SCIENTIFIC DISPUTES, POLITICAL DISPUTES AND SOCIETY PROJECTS. Projeto História : Revista Do Programa De Estudos Pós-Graduados De História, 65. https://doi.org/10.23925/2176-2767.2019v65p380-415